Your submission has passed the technical checks and is now in peer review The status “Under Review” indicates that When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. Another emerging trend is the integration of technology into the peer review process. From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 21 Submission to acceptance (median days): 196. ) I have the same issues with Springer right now. Once the submission has been sent out for review by the journal When a research manuscript first lands in your inbox, it needs to go through a number of checks verifying completeness of the submission, and ensuring that the conducted research and manuscript preparation followed ethical and technical standards. I received a relatively long list of changes that were confusing and contradictory. If not, and it directly went to ‘Under Review’ after submission, this indicates the internal check (for aspects such as scope match, novelty factor, quality of the writing, and adherence to guidelines). On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. For further clarity on status updates, you may refer to the following resources: Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Make sure you are Free Language check ; General formatting rules for all article types Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. This initial screening might be to check if the manuscript is written in an acceptable language; contains We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. If your submitted paper was sent back to you as it failed the journal's Technical Check, the specific reasons for this are detailed in the e-mail notification. The PLOS ONE peer review process. Your submitted article will be evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. To opt in, all co-authors agree to have their manuscript posted as a preprint with a CC-BY 4. Gather in-depth actionable insights and adhere to technical compliances; Measure a document’s compliance against 25+ expertly-curated AI-powered checks; This Report is tailor-made to check academic manuscripts before journal submission Integration of Technology in Peer Review. By undergoing peer review, manuscripts should become: More robust - peer reviewers may point out gaps in a paper that require Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. W hen you choose a PLOS journal you are putting integrity first and supporting an organization committed to research that is robust, reliable, and accessible to all. Congratulations! Now it will go for peer If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. Peer review takes different forms and each type has pros and cons. Transparent peer review: If the manuscript is published, the peer review reports appear online alongside the article. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial assessment and screening for technical requirements. If the manuscript clears This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. We will now find the most suitable editor to manage the next steps of your submission. The "out for review" or "under review" status indicates that your paper has passed the initial admin check and is now being scrutinized by peer reviewers. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. The status said "reviews completed" (2 reviewers sent their reports). Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. A delay at this stage either means that the AE is not sure of your paper, or more probably, hasn’t even got to reviewing it, possibly because they are busy with other manuscripts and other Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry 许多作者都会经历第一次投稿SCI，难免会因经验欠缺而不了解SCI期刊审稿的一般流程。说实话，虽然我们知道了各种状态的含义，能做的也不多，但是了解了这些状态，正确对待它们起码能避免我们整天茶饭不思，刷网页刷 Double-Anonymized Peer Review: After initial checks, your manuscript moves to peer review. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. As an editor, you’ll appreciate the amount of effort that goes into the peer review process. When the editorial office receives a new or revised manuscript, it is queued for a Round 2 peer reviews are blinded. There are many people involved, Step 4: Peer Review During the peer review process, reviewers thoroughly evaluate the manuscript's content, methodology, originality, and significance. Next Steps If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Dear all, yesterday, I submitted my revised paper that had received a "major revision. Peer review is vital to the quality of published research. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is Your submission has passed the technical checks and is now in peer review. When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments: How to pass it: It comes down to submitting the right manuscript to the right publication. Usage 2023 Downloads: 3,569,666 Altmetric mentions: 2,070. However, after 2 months the submission was still in the "initial Tips for optimizing technical checks. The trouble started at the initial technical check. They claim to make a first decision in a maximum of 45 days. Authors will be able to check the progress of their manuscript at any point of the peer review process by logging into the submission system. I submitted the manuscript using the journal's LaTeX template and followed the journal's submission instructions carefully as I like to minimize going back-and-forth over minor formatting mistakes. Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. If you see this status, your submission has passed the technical check, and the editorial team is selecting an editor. β-Ionone Liposomes" We are pleased to let you know that your manuscript has now passed through the review stage and is ready for. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are being explored to assist in identifying suitable reviewers, streamlining the submission process, and even providing preliminary assessments of manuscripts. 0 license and a DOI, becoming a permanent part of the scholarly record. Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 21 Submission to acceptance (median days): 137 Usage 2023 Downloads: 7,167,242 Altmetric mentions: 4,454. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has About the Peer Review Process . There should not be direct correspondence between authors and peer reviewers; communication is mediated by the Editor. These are some tips on what we look out for: Common manuscript issues Plagiarism (even if accidental) We use advanced technologies to spot incidences of identical or similar copy. Answer: Most journals run a “technical check” to see if a manuscript is formatted correctly and complies with journal policies. Sent Back to Author. I had submitted the revised paper around 16th March 2023. Generally, only one letter defending your submission will be accepted for each of the review stages (editorial review and peer review). Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. If you are unsuccessful after sending a response letter, then you should strongly consider selecting another journal. The paper is under second revision but first technical revision. Comments will be anonymous if the journal follows a single-anonymous or double-anonymous peer review model. More about our metrics . Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable Yes, "Under Review" typically indicates that the submitted paper has successfully passed the initial editorial check and has entered the peer review process. This is done before a submission is sent out for peer review. Learn about the different types of peer review and the stages of the process at BMJ journals. 10. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 3 Submission to acceptance (median days): 91. Peer-review policy your publication Submission guidelines Our 3-step submission process. ” It means your article is not in the large bracket of articles which are directly rejected from the Editor's/Assistant Editor's desk without peer review. Hope this helps. Why do peer review? Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the manuscript. If your The "decision in process" status for a manuscript means that the editorial board is reviewing the manuscript after it has passed peer review. Every step is described and will let you know whether any action is required, which you can then perform as appropriate by PLOS is a mission-driven open science publisher covering all scientific disciplines with a focus on fundamental and applied research across life, health, sustainability, engineering, and technology. At its simplest, journal peer review has been described as “the assessment by an expert, of material submitted for publication” [5]. In this interactive module, we walk you through the individual steps that need to be completed before the manuscript is This stage indicates that your paper has not yet been sent for peer review. Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 25 Submission to acceptance (median days): 146 Usage 2023 Downloads: 2,693,510 Altmetric mentions: 1,378. Technical Check Report Ensure Technical Compliance with Our AI-Powered Report. Which is already a good thing – as that means the associate editor (AE) believes the paper has merit and also matches the journal scope. At this stage, the manuscript is being evaluated by experts in the field who will assess its quality, validity, and suitability for publication. Kindly suggest what can be done in this regard. When Technical Check workflow is activated: New/Revised submissions of the configured article types appear in the folders 'New/Revised Submissions' until Technical Check is done. Dear Dr Miatmoko, Re: "The Effect of 1,2-Dioleoyl-3-Trimethylammonium Propane (DOTAP) Addition on the Physical Characteristics of. It will guide you through the stages from the moment your article has been submitted until a decision was made. Sage Open's peer review is double-anonymized, which means our authors and reviewers cannot know each other’s identities. This initial screening might be to check if the manuscript is written in an acceptable language; 2024年2月29日晚上，投稿系统状态发生了变化，”Submission has passed the technical checks and is now in peer review“，下面还有一段话，”We will now find the most suitable editor to manage the next steps of your submission. Most journals run a “technical check” to see if a manuscript is formatted correctly and complies with journal policies. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has The status of my manuscript is showing Decision in Process for almost two months. The status change from ‘Waiting for Editor’s Decision’ to ‘Quality check passed’ seems a bit unusual. Now that we’ve gone over the key manuscript areas to cover in your journal’s technical checklist, remember that your submission form is your friend and can help you simplify and even eliminate many common technical check steps! making your peer review and publishing processes better for all Ref: Submission ID 412dcda0-e599-471c-8112-847bbe2c2758 Dear Dr Moreau, Re: "Mental health consequences of military sexual trauma : results from a national survey in the French military" We are pleased to let you know that your manuscript has now passed through the review stage and is ready for revision. revision. The document is now awaiting a formatting check by the journal. Carefully investigate the journal’s scope before submitting to ensure that your manuscript has a good chance of publication. Till then, it is showing "Decision in Process". At Scientific Reports, we focus on ensuring that all papers we publish are of high technical quality, and let the scientific community determine the impact of your work. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. However, it could be that the editorial board member who is handling your manuscript felt that some basic check (on language and formatting) was needed after your revision and before they could check it again. No editor assignment is possible I submitted a manuscript to a springer journal the progress of my manuscript was as technical check passed and waiting to be assigned to an editor, ten reviewers invited, 2 accepted, one reviewers Authors are aware of the peer reviewers’ names during the peer-review process and vice versa. So, check your chosen journal’s peer-review policy before you submit, to make sure you know what to expect and are comfortable with your paper being reviewed in that way. Under review: The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. The fact that your paper has been considered for and sent for peer review is a good sign! Although you have stated that your paper's status was initially "out for review" and then was updated Optical and Quantum Electronics Review Speed, Peer-Review Duration, Revision Process, Time from Submission to 1st Editorial/Reviewer Decision & Time from Submission to Acceptance/Publication I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. At this stage, Sage Open will invite reviewers for your manuscript until we have three completed evaluation forms. This process can take a few weeks. What is peer review and why is it If you see this status, your submission has passed the technical check, and the editorial team is selecting an editor. Use this information to make changes, resubmit and include a 'Response to Technical Check'. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. . The response to reviewers is included with the Our editorial process. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. The peer review process. The reviews were completed by 23rd March. Now you’ve identified a journal to submit to, there are a few things you should be familiar with before you submit. This model includes “crowd-sourced” peer review where articles are published either immediately or after superficial initial checks by the journal, leaving any definitive and authoritative assessment to the scientific community. Stage 2: Editor assigned. Recently, a novel alternative to the standard peer-review process, called open peer review, has been piloted to address, in part, the critics listed above. Journals with following an open or transparent peer review model will share the identities of the reviewers with the author(s). If the manuscript clears the internal check, it will be sent for peer review. Awaiting Editor Decision. Read more about our editorial policies here. Ref: Submission ID cdf48bd0-0dc3-4db5-96f2-4bfd93589444. Feedback from the peer reviewers will contribute to the editor’s decision on whether to accept or reject your article for publication. 8、Technical Check in Progress：检查稿件是否符合期刊投稿要求，如格式文件是否齐全、是否抄袭、作者邮箱是否有效等。 9、Under Review：表示审稿人已接受审稿，目前正在审稿中，这是一个漫长的等待过程（期刊一般限定审稿人审稿时间为1个月左右） If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. They assess the strengths and weaknesses of the study, identify any errors or gaps in the research, and provide constructive feedback to improve the manuscript. If your submission is successful, they will invite reviewers to peer review your work. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. As the corresponding or submitting author, you can track the progress of your article online via Your research (login required). Use this information The current peer-review system is being overloaded with manuscript submissions that increasingly exceed reviewer availability and journal publication space. Certain publications have a Technical Check process all submissions to the journal must go through. Find out how to check the status of your submission and the average time to first decision. Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Required reviews complete If you see this status, your submission has passed the technical check, and the editorial team is selecting an editor. Then, two weeks later it switched back to "passed technical checks, now If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. In my field(s) one often waits 3-6 month from submission to get a real response to a submission, due largely to the slow review process. This initial screening might be to check if the manuscript is written in an acceptable language; contains the required elements such as author details, abstract, and declarations; uses the required citation style; and is within the journal’s length limits. Before you submit. Around 10 weeks ago I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports. If the manuscript passes this screening, it is sent for peer review. When you submit a manuscript to us, we run a technical check to make sure that there are no issues that could stop your work being properly reviewed. With editor: The manuscript has been placed with a member of the editorial board for handling. This is where the peer review process comes into the picture, putting each manuscript through stringent checks to ensure the research is significant and of the highest quality before it is deemed worthy of publishing. We also partner with initiatives like Review Commons and Peer Community In to weave pre-submission commenting into the review process and further streamline decision making. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has Authors have the option to opt in to In Review directly from the submission system of participating journals. If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. Once an article has passed the initial screening process, it’s sent for peer review. (I have a book under review right now that I sent out in September and still only have one of the three reviewer's reports back. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. " Today the status was changed to "Decision in progress. The editor will carefully evaluate the comments from the peer reviewers and examine the manuscript, and they may also consult with the reviewers again for clarity. Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. " In my experience, it should be "Under review", and then "Decision in progress" a few weeks later, right? We think we have completed 90% of required experiments and responded to every question of reviewers. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. No editor assignment is possible Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Once the full complement of required feedback has been received, the Academic Editor issues a decision. As per the normal journal processes, the editor first conducts an initial screening of the manuscript. Revising. Several peer The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. If however there were status updates before this one (such as for the internal check), the manuscript has been sent for peer review. Although the status is peer review and Your submission has passed technical checks as of 06 Mar 24, the editors’ decision can take several weeks as they may consult peer If your submitted paper was sent back to you as it failed the journal's Technical Check, the specific reasons for this are detailed in the e-mail notification. If the manuscript passes this check, it will then be assigned to a handling editor who will initiate the peer review process by assigning 2-3 potential reviewers to review the manuscript. 5. This depends a great deal on the particular journal. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the manuscripts they review. Technical Check. 各位老师好，投稿BMC系列的一个杂志一个多月了，第1天通过了技术初审，后来经历了3次技术审核，目前显示your submission has passed technical checks, The editors' decision can take several weeks as they may consult peer reviewers. Linked to the development of the scientific method as described by Francis Bacon in Novum Organum in 1620, peer review was instigated in the mid-18 th century by Royal Societies in the UK, with the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal The AE will now check your manuscript for aspects such as the novelty of the research and the quality of the paper and decide whether or not it should go for peer review. Our Manuscript submission has surely become quicker and more efficient with the help of online submission systems. The type of peer review model used will often vary between journals, even of the same publisher. The peer review history package includes the editorial decision letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. This involves finding an editor with expertise in your manuscript's subject matter to oversee the peer review process. There are three things that happen to a manuscript between submission and editorial decision: the Technical Check, the Review Cycle, and the Editorial Review. Researchers across the world strongly acknowledge the value of the peer review process. 2) If your submission has entered the Peer Review process, this status means that a recommendation has been made on your submission and the Editor in Chief is assessing this recommendation in order to make their decision. zfsus chie fbgn lmd xgnwgp tpm zacrg riziq qlbhks dyjfbqg