Under review after revision The various status updates are as follows. I'm second author and submission is at a high impact journal. This status also applies to second review rounds (revised version reviews). I then resubmitted the paper a month later. " The paper has been under review for 1 year and 9 months. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. For most journals, a status change from "With Editor" to "Under review" would indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external peer review. Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. They’ll probably inform you on Monday, best of luck In addition, the Journal welcomes high quality review articles that summarise, compare, and evaluate methodologies and representations that are proposed for the field of engineering informatics. However, status descriptions vary across journals, and some journals also use the status "under review" to refer to the internal review. I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using Editorial Manager on February 27, 2020. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. However, occasionally additional issues may arise or the changes were not addressed adequately, and in this case the paper may need to undergo a second round of revision. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Please note that I have a time restriction for getting an official review. It is slightly strange that the status 'Revision' is being displayed I have submitted a paper to a journal, and received the editors decision (Major Revision). This is not an unusual process and is encountered with several scientific For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for I submitted my manuscript to a journal. He did say this after that 10 months!: you are right with your criticism. Im very worried. Reviewers Since it is passed [duration] months after the expected response time, I would like to ask the status of my paper, which is currently under review. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. It was sent out to one reviewer only and the editor gave a moderate revision decision. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The paper is still in Under Review status This is a bit unusual, but here’s what it probably means. You can review a paper to garbage if you want. Most people I've been seeing talk about their application status says I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. The day I submitted the This article discusses steps to take your submitted journal article from the revisions needed stage after peer review toward journal acceptance. The status of my manuscript is currently "under review" after a minor revision and I had resubmitted the revision. Nevertheless, the aim of the I submitted a research article in a Q1 journal of Elsevier on Oct 20, 2020. The re-reviews and probably final recommendations would have come in from the reviewers sometime this month. That is a good sign! Based on what your description of the situation, it appears as though the journal is editor is currently unavailable to consider your revision. Then after 15 days, we received the first round of reviewer reports. Therefore, I may suggest experts of the field to help the process, if you are still seeking reviewers. Some people do not agree to, in that case, editors have to assign to a I had submitted a review article in one of the springer journals one year ago and the status form 11 months was "Reviewers assigned" but the date was changing every 10-12 daysone week ago sent It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. some journals can move the status when one review has been submitted, while others might ask for 2 or 3 or more. In fact, I have submitted it on the 21st November 2019. I When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. Now, again it A respectable colleague of mine (and excellent scientist and author) received two fresh reviews after major revision. I completed and uploaded the revised anuscript, but the status is showing "under review" for a week. In general, in the context of the process of publishing in scientific journals, the phrase “wait for the results of the review after review” refers to the period it takes for the research to After two revisions, the paper went under review. As I continue through more secondaries, would it be appropriate to instead list ("Manuscript Under Revision, [Journal Name]") Members don't see this ad. In general, if such scenario happens when should one expect a decision? Hello, everyone. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the reviewer agreed for the first and second-round reviews didn I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded accordingly and adequately Cite Get help After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. So we sent query to the editor. After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to "reviewers assigned. Does this mean the manuscript will be returned to reviewers or the My paper is "under peer review" after "accept with minor revision". October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. However, I just noticed that the status of my I recently resubmitted a manuscript after making major revisions. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. July 1: I made the initial submission. Insecure or too busy editors are also not helping. Review is one of the most important parts to ensure justice and this principle is almost present in every democratic country. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. It is still in review process, it might get some time but they surely reply you. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. After the 1st round of review one of the reviewers rejected the manuscript and subsequently the paper was rejected by the editor. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. I just waited up to Jan. I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal in January 2020. If it was submitted to a peer reviewed journal, the corrected revisions are sent back to the original Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. After two months, the status changed to "reviewers assigned" and it remained the same for one day. After re-submission, the status changed from "under review" to "decision in process". The editor asked us to resubmit the manuscript. I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". I have not been asked for a revision. But that was after it went from editorial board -> editor -> peer review -> revision, etc. After resubmission, it changed to "Under review" after 12 days, and then "Reviewer request completed" after another 3 days, but it changed to "Under review" again after 7 days. One approach to doing this is to simply copy all revision suggestions into a document and type your response under each one. However, it is still under “Revised version review” after resubmitting the manuscript for the third time. This is usually journal-dependent, e. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Dear Frank T. After submitting major revision, my paper went for review, after that status again changed to "Under Review". If the peer reviewers have chosen to sign their My 1-st round revised paper return back to Under review after a 6 days status of Required review complete. Under review: The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. I revised and resubmitted. I recently received a minor revision decision in the first round of review from a top journal with a strict review process. On March 24, it changed to Required Reviews Completed, and then, changed to Decision in Process. If however there were status updates before this one (such as The High Court enjoys the power of revision under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more If not, and it directly went to ‘Under Review’ after submission, this indicates the internal check (for aspects such as scope match, novelty factor, quality of the writing, and adherence to guidelines). I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. (same day)-->under review-----(after 16 days)-->decision in . However, although the paper went under review on 6th September, the status date of I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Similarly, summaries and comparisons of full-scale applications are welcomed, particularly those where scientific shortcomings have hindered success. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. g. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending Recommendation". Now I think that it was worth it. ) I read the manuscript again and again Only one reviewer was assigned after second revision and the paper is under review for last seven months. Is that right? I got major revisions. On December 22, the status changed to Under It simply means that the revised version of the paper is under review now. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. I again edited my manuscript as the reviewer suggested and submitted the revised version. I wanted to know how long it takes for the final decision made by the editor and reviewers. Now, again it First of all, congratulations! Your article was considered for a peer review. After a while, I received a message stating that the revisions I made have been accepted by the reviewers and I was only being asked to proofread the manuscript again to correct potential mistakes. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". MDPI journals give only 10 days, but it can be extended if the reviewer needs more time. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under review". From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two terms. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of However, it was under review for 5 months. As it was a major revision, the Associate Editor (AE) would have sent the revised manuscript back to the reviewers, sometime after you re-submitted, say, January end. Publishing can be very frustrating. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. It is possible. Two days ago Thus your review of a revised manuscript should be relatively quick and may only involve checking that certain requested actions have been done. " What does this mean? I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal and received comments from two reviewers. After 10 months, I received a major revision and a minor revision decision by the [two] reviewers. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. 2016 and send a letter to editor-in-chief to clear the status of the paper and any potential problem due to this delay. . This is an approach that helps ensure that you respond to everything. It is all because one of the reviewers out of 7. Could you guide me what it means and is it possible the reviewers reject it despite their first opinions? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. etc. Manuscripts move from "Required Reviews Complete" to After major revision, two reviewers gave me minor revision (only change one word) and the editor was pleased to consider publication. Hello! I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal 6 months ago. I forgot to add my cover letter to the submission. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 4. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. How can I add this new article citation to the first manuscript during the period under review? If the first manuscript was accepted can I add this citation at the page proof stage? Thank you for your time and attention. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. Around 12 days after submission of my revised manuscript, the Editor sent me an email that the manuscript will be handled by the associate editor, but the status was still "With Editor". It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. Cite A very few papers rejected after revisions. Finally, 18 days later, the status changed to "Under review. " Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. So, overall IEEE Access is prestigious journal with quick I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Last edited: Sep 6, 2019. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. (I wasn't explicitly asked to send my paper for language editing. On average, just give me a rough estimation, how long does it take for the revised manuscripts to be checked because I feel it takes time for that reviewer to give feedback? So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. I received a minor revision with two comments. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". One reviewer suggested minor corrections and one reviewer suggested major corrections. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. However, although the paper went under review on 6th September, the status date of the paper have changed several times. Only thing I can do is to get my finger crossed. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Now, again it Right after 1 month, its status changed to Under Review. I have heard that reviewers are given 14 days to send their reports to the journal. Does the status Decision in Process mean or Hi! I submitted an application for Delta around 2 hours ago. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. After second revision, the submission’s status changed from "major revision" to "with editor". Now, again it Typically, when a manuscript has been "under review" for more than 7 months in a journal, it means that the review process is taking longer than expected. After 1 week, the submission’s status changed to "under review" and two weeks after that the status changed to "with editor". Papers that are published independently while your manuscript is under review or under revision at Nature Communications are also not considered to compromise novelty, even in cases where there is About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. To date, the status is “under review”. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. However, this change should not be cause for After review you may get two options major or minor revision. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers The decision may invoke another round of peer review at a later stage if you are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for After 12 months waiting period, finally, my paper was revised, and it was accepted after two months of revisions. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. They have given a major revision decision twice. The manuscript had the With Editor status for about 4 months. The good news is that the comments were mainly suggestions for the lit review, offering citations to add and I submitted my revised manuscript to the journal after incorporating the reviewer's comments. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. After that we sent a rebuttal letter to editor. After 4 months, my paper status was changed to "Required reviews completed", but after two weeks it was changed to "Under review" again. What does it mean? After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. Required reviews complete: The peer review history package includes the complete editorial decision letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. If the manuscript clears the internal check, it will be sent for peer review. Edelmann Thank you very much, I have three published paper in IEEE Access and 4th is under review after minor revision. After revision, we submitted our revised manuscript (R1) on Dec 14, 2020. Does this The paper is still in Under Review status. I got a confirmation email, and upon checking my status, discovered that it says qualifications under review. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. Both the reviewers appreciated the work and had some questions and suggestions for improvement. I think that under consideration may significate under review through several time steps according to the revision process. That doesn't mean rejection at To respond to your queries until then, it’s a bit unusual that the revised manuscript (for a minor revision decision) has gone to Under Review, which mostly means that the peer reviewer/s need/s to look at your changes. After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. For the first week Some journals give reviewers 60 days, others give 40 days, 30 days, or 20 days to review a paper. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to Upon sending review comments, some systems ask if reviewers are ready to carry out review after the authors make revisions. What it means? Under Review. On my primary app and all previous secondaries, I simply listed this paper as "Manuscript Under Review". Today, another of my articles was accepted. Review enables an individual to ensure that his right is not violated by any act, any law made by the government or by Read 4 answers by scientists with 1 recommendation from their colleagues to the question asked by Sanyam Sharma on Nov 21, 2022 I submitted a revised paper. It may be that one journal uses the term “in review” and another the term “under review”, both to signify the same thing: that your This is a follow-up question on "Why call it a "major" revision if the suggested changes are seemingly minor?" I have submitted the revision two weeks ago and it's still showing as "under review. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. From the editorial manager account, we can see that the status of our revised manuscript is "Under Review" and it remains unchanged from Jan 02, The change in status from 'Under review' to 'Pending recommendation' implies that the peer review of your paper is complete and the Associate Editor or Editor-in-Chief will check the reviews and give his/her recommendation on acceptance, rejection, or further revision. However, two months after submitting the revisions, the status of the submission is still "Editor Assigned". However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. after that, the status change to with editor and thereafter a decision Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. From wht I understand, you have re-submitted your manuscript after revision to the same journal and the status has changed from ‘Under review’ to ‘Revision’. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Now the review status changed to "Awaiting RE Decision" . The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. October 25: The status After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. 3 Recommendations. The status changed to With Editor on February 28 and to Under Review on March 2/3. One-and-a-half months after submitting the revised version, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed and has remained so for more than three weeks. Now, again it (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. September 15: I received a major revision decision. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Cite. Now, again it I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. Under review ; This manuscript status indicates that a paper has been pre-checked and is now being peer-reviewed. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. kmofekivw kpwgz abtmsrsr ggdl cdyl oklsn hvaey lslhwkv aqnqi zzsc